Breast Cancer Coverage from Every Angle
Advertisement
Advertisement

De-escalation of Bone-Targeting Agents for Bone Metastases From Breast Cancer

By: Kayci Reyer
Posted: Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Research presented at the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting (Abstract 11501) found no significant difference in outcomes between patients receiving bone-targeted agents every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks. The study included patients with breast cancer and patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, all of whom had bone metastases.

“The data presented would suggest that de-escalation of all commonly used [bone-targeting agents] is a reasonable treatment option,” concluded Mark J. Clemons, MD, of the University of Ottawa in Canada, and colleagues.

A total of 263 patients (60.8% with breast cancer, 39.2% with prostate cancer) were randomly assigned to receive either 12-weekly (n = 130; 49.4%) or 4-weekly (n = 133; 50.6%) bone-targeting agent therapy. The agents administered included denosumab (n = 148; 56.3%), zoledronate (n = 63; 24.0%), and pamidronate (n = 52; 19.8%). The majority of participants (n = 138; 52.5%) had not previously received bone-targeted agents.

The researchers did not find a meaningful difference in outcomes between the 12-weekly and 4-weekly groups. The median measurements in health-related quality of life (0 with 12-weekly vs. 0 with 4-weekly), pain (0 vs. 0), Global Health Status (0 vs. 0), symptomatic skeletal events rates (18.5% vs.16.5%), and 1-year symptomatic skeletal event–free rate (73.2% vs. 77.9%) were similar in both groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in outcomes found in patients who had received and those who had received prior bone-targeted agents, nor were there differences in outcomes among those receiving denosumab versus zoledronate versus pamidronate. This finding extended to comparable reports of renal impairment (2.3% with 12-weekly vs. 3.0% with 4-weekly), symptomatic hypocalcemia (1.5% vs. 1.5%), or osteonecrosis of the jaw (0.8% vs. 0.8%).

Disclosure: The study authors’ disclosure information may be found at coi.asco.org.



By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.