Site Editors

Shaji K. Kumar, MD

Prashant Kapoor, MD, FACP

Advertisement
Advertisement

Can a Novel Scoring System Predict Outcomes With CAR T-Cell Therapy for Myeloma?

By: Joshua D. Madera, MD
Posted: Thursday, October 12, 2023

Because of the complex treatment-related adverse effects associated with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, the CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) scoring system was designed to determine clinical outcomes in this clinical scenario, according to a study published in the Journal of Hematology & Oncology. The CAR-HT scoring system has prognostic utility for patients and may help predict those most suitable for CAR T-cell therapy and how to mitigate treatment-related adverse effects, explained Kai Rejeski, MD, of LMU University Hospital, Munich, and colleagues.

A total of 113 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma were analyzed retrospectively. All were receiving CAR T-cell therapy at one of six CAR T-cell international *treatment centers. CAR-HT scores were calculated for all patients and were stratified based on whether they were HT-low (n = 63) or HT-high (n = 50). The score, which was determined before lymphodepletion, comprises five markers of hematotoxicity: platelet count, absolute neutrophil count, hemoglobin level, C-reactive protein, and ferritin level.

Patients with HT-high scores were found to have significantly prolonged severe neutropenia (9 days) compared with patients with HT-low scores (3 days). This same trend was observed for severe infection rate (40% vs. 5%, respectively) and severe immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (16% vs. 0%, respectively). Furthermore, the rate of relapse mortality at the 1-year interval was increased for patients with HT-high scores (13%) compared with patients with HT-low scores (2%). This relapse was mostly attributable to fatal infections. Moreover, patients with HT-high scores had a decreased overall survival (10.5 months) and inferior progression-free survival (5 months) compared with their counterparts.

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit biomedcentral.com.


By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.